![]()
CTBA Legislative Update
May 5, 2006
H. R. 4777
Title: To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand and modernize the
prohibition against interstate gambling, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep. Bob Godlatte (VA) (introduced 2/26/06 Cosponsor 131
Latest Major Action 5/3/06 House committee/subcommittee action Status: Forwarded
by Subcommittee to Full Committee.
The following are the California members:
Rep. Dennis Cardoza
Rep. Wally Herger
Rep. Duncan Hunter
Rep. Daniel Lungren
Rep. Elton Gallegly
Rep. Jerry Lewis
Rep. Howard McKeon
Rep. William Thomas
PROTECT DOMESTIC HORSERACING
Support H.R. 4777, The Internet Gambling Protection Act
--H.R. 4777 was introduced by Rep. Bob Goodlatte and has over 130 cosponsors.
This bill is designed to help curtail illegal Internet gambling. Internet gaming
is largely illegal currently in the U.S., but offshore sites in places like
Antigua, Costa Rica, and even Great Britain are attracting thousands of U.S.
bettors.
--This legislation, however, also recognizes that states have traditionally been
the regulator or gaming in their own states. Additionally, the legislation also
recognizes that horseracing is unique and is the only form of gaming that
operates under a federal statute—the Interstate Horseracing Act (IHA)—in
addition to state regulation.
--The IHA allows account wagering and Internet wagering on horseracing where
permissible by states. Currently, 19 states have made executive decisions or
passed state legislation to allow such wagering. The IHA was first passed by
Congress in 1978 and later amended in 2000 to allow this type of activity as
allowable under state law.
--Rep. Goodlatte’s bill recognizes states’ rights and the IHA and does not
outlaw this activity. Instead, the bill’s focus is primarily on illegal offshore
wagering. If these important provisions were removed from the bill, the entire
domestic horse industry would be greatly threatened with economic ruin.
--According to a recent study performed by Deloitte Consulting LLP, the horse
industry contributes some $39 billion annually to the U.S. economy and provides
nearly 1.5 million full-time jobs. Additionally, nearly 2 million people own
horses and another 2 million are involved with horses through volunteer work or
other affiliations.
--The Department of Justice has long contended that there is a conflict between
the IHA and the 1961 Wire Act regarding Internet gaming. It is the horse
industry’s strong belief that the IHA explicitly allows legal wagering on
horseracing where permissible by states and that was the very basis of the IHA,
which was debated and passed by Congress many years after the Wire Act. To date,
the Department has filed no suit against any horseracing endeavor as allowed on
the IHA.
--Regardless of whether Justice’s interpretation is correct or the industry’s
is, this legislation does not endorse either view. This legislation recognizes
that if the IHA is viable, the current horseracing wagering as allowed by states
would continue. Alternatively, if DoJ’s interpretation were correct, then
current horserace wagering allowed by states under the IHA would be illegal.
--We strongly encourage you to support H.R. 4777 and to vote against any
amendments that would harm states’ historical rights to regulate the horseracing
industry as allowed under the Interstate Horseracing Act.